supreme+rule
121Clear statement rule — In American law, the clear statement rule is a guideline for statutory construction, instructing courts to not interpret a statute in a way that will have particular consequences unless the statute makes unmistakably clear its intent to achieve… …
122Single-subject rule — A single subject rule is a general term for a section present in many state constitutions within the United States of America. It generally specifies that ballot initiatives and legislation can only deal with one main issue. Its purpose is to… …
1232004 term United States Supreme Court opinions of Antonin Scalia — Concurrence width=25px Concurrence/dissent white space: nowrap |Total = 25 colspan=2 | Bench opinions = 25 colspan=2 | Opinions relating to orders = 0 colspan=2 | In chambers opinions = 0 white space: nowrap colspan=2 valign=top | Unanimous… …
124McNabb–Mallory rule — Mc·Nabb–Mal·lo·ry rule /mək nab ma lə rē / n [after McNabb v. United States, 318 U.S. 332 (1943) and Mallory v. United States, 354 U.S. 449 (1957), U.S. Supreme Court cases that established the rule]: a doctrine in criminal procedure: an arrestee …
125List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 500 — This is a list of all the United States Supreme Court cases from volume 500 of the United States Reports :* Stevens v. Department of Treasury , ussc|500|1|1991 * In re Amendment to Rule 39 , ussc|500|13|1991 (per curiam) * In re Demos ,… …
126List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 248 — This is a list of all the United States Supreme Court cases from volume 248 of the United States Reports :* Pittsburgh Melting Co. v. Totten , 248 U.S. 1 (1918) * Watts, Watts Co. v. Unione Austriaca di Navigazione , 248 U.S. 9 (1918) * King v.… …
127syllabus rule — The rule that the syllabus of a decision, as printed in the cases contained in the state reports, alone constitutes the law of the case. Walsh v E. G. Shinner & Co. (CA3 Del) 20 F2d 586. Such rule is established in Ohio as a rule of court… …
128superior servant rule — The common law rule that an employee assumes the risk of the negligence of his superior fellow servant in directing employees, the operation of machinery, and the conduct of the work, to the same extent that he assumes the risk of the negligence… …
